![Philosophy Talk](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- Видео 1 299
- Просмотров 726 105
Philosophy Talk
Добавлен 19 дек 2010
Sundays 11 am on KALW 91.7 FM, and streaming live at www.kalw.org. Outside the SF Bay Area: www.philosophytalk.org/stations.
"Philosophy Talk" is weekly radio program created and lead by John Perry and Ken Taylor, two Philosophy Professors from Stanford University.
Philosophy Talk seeks to bring the richness of philosophical thought to a broad public. The show has been on the air since January 2004. It is currently broadcast on more than 100 public radio stations nationwide and can even be heard in international markets.
Philosophy Talk is also a travel road show. We regularly do perform the program in front of audiences around the country. We'd love to come to your neck of the woods and put on a show for you.
"Philosophy Talk" is weekly radio program created and lead by John Perry and Ken Taylor, two Philosophy Professors from Stanford University.
Philosophy Talk seeks to bring the richness of philosophical thought to a broad public. The show has been on the air since January 2004. It is currently broadcast on more than 100 public radio stations nationwide and can even be heard in international markets.
Philosophy Talk is also a travel road show. We regularly do perform the program in front of audiences around the country. We'd love to come to your neck of the woods and put on a show for you.
Marx and Morality: Roving Philosophical Report
We sent our Roving Philosophical Reporter, Holly J. McDede, to consider what Marxism says about the morality of electoral politics. More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/marx-and-morality.
Просмотров: 27
Видео
596: How To Do Things With Your Mind
Просмотров 2323 часа назад
More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/how-do-things-your-mind. We all engage in mental actions of various kinds, whether it’s planning the coming week, trying to remember the lyrics of a song, or imagining what we’d look like with a different haircut. These thought processes have significance for us and help us direct our other actions. But are we really in control of trains of thoughts or do th...
Anna Julia Cooper
Просмотров 10День назад
More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/anna-julia-cooper. Born into slavery in the nineteenth century, Anna Julia Cooper received a classical education, attended the Sorbonne, and became the fourth African American in history to be awarded a PhD. Her first book, A Voice from the South, offered one of the first articulations of how Black women are impacted by race, gender, and socioeconomic class....
How to Do Things With Your Mind: The Sixty Second Philosopher
Просмотров 21День назад
More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/how-do-things-with-your-mind.
Mexican Philosophy: Roving Philosophical Report
Просмотров 11День назад
We sent our Roving Philosophical Reporter, Holly J. McDede, to find out what Mexican Philosophy means to students at a community college near the U.S. southern border. More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/mexican-philosophy.
How to Do Things With Your Mind: Roving Philosophical Report
Просмотров 53День назад
We sent our Roving Philosophical Reporter, Sarah Lai Stirland, to find out whether meditation helps us control our thoughts. More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/how-do-things-with-your-mind.
How To Do Things With Your Mind
Просмотров 54День назад
More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/how-do-things-your-mind. We all engage in mental actions of various kinds, whether it’s planning the coming week, trying to remember the lyrics of a song, or imagining what we’d look like with a different haircut. These thought processes have significance for us and help us direct our other actions. But are we really in control of trains of thoughts or do th...
John Locke: Roving Philosophical Report
Просмотров 4214 дней назад
We sent our Roving Philosophical Reporter, Caitlin Esch, to learn more about Locke's life: his biography, his assignation plots, his relation to the radical Thomists-and to find out what's up with all those other people named "John Locke." More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/john-locke.
Hegel
Просмотров 3814 дней назад
More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/hegel. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel is without doubt one of the most influential philosophers of all time. He has, however, been largely ignored by American "analytic" philosophers of the twentieth century. John in particular, and Ken to a lesser extent, don't know nearly as much about Hegel and his philosophy as they should. They will be lively if somewhat...
Cancel Culture: Roving Philosophical Report
Просмотров 3314 дней назад
We sent our Roving Philosophical Reporter, Holly J. McDede, to trace some of the history of cancel culture-the term and its appearances in popular culture. More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/cancel-culture.
Cancel Culture
Просмотров 3014 дней назад
More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/cancel-culture. Revoking support or a platform from someone who is perceived to have behaved badly has recently been dubbed “cancel culture.” Many complain that this pervasive practice promotes mob mentality and stifles free speech. But is "cancel culture" a real phenomenon, or has it become an overused and meaningless concept? Is publicly censuring others f...
Marx and Morality
Просмотров 5521 день назад
More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/marx-and-morality. Karl Marx famously attempted to explain our social, political, and economic systems in terms of class conflict. While he never explicitly states that capitalism is unjust, some scholars suggest that there is an implicit moral critique of it in his work. Sodoes Marx reject capitalism for its moral failures, or is his opposition to it purely...
Who Speaks For You: Roving Philosophical Report
Просмотров 37Месяц назад
Who Speaks For You: Roving Philosophical Report
Can Architecture Be Political: Roving Philosophical Report
Просмотров 33Месяц назад
Can Architecture Be Political: Roving Philosophical Report
Liberty and Justice For Who(m): Roving Philosophical Report
Просмотров 35Месяц назад
Liberty and Justice For Who(m): Roving Philosophical Report
#MeToo: Retribution, Accountability, and Justice
Просмотров 40Месяц назад
#MeToo: Retribution, Accountability, and Justice
What Can Virtual Reality (Actually) Do?
Просмотров 232 месяца назад
What Can Virtual Reality (Actually) Do?
The works of Osho about child rearing in romantic and intimacy sharing with other kids are also interesting. But how immoral. Just like free love, and free thought, all over history, same story, pretty much.
Excellent talk, once again in history, people mostly show their inability to imagine new kinds of experiences of life, and feel free to express their paranoia about situations that are deemed, in lack of a better word, untraditional. And while traditions change all the time, human nature doesn't. Go see the world by yourselves, and mind your own asses and others various organs, if possible.
what
where is the rest of this?
This should be seen by everyone..
Just found this channel and I love it.. tho I think the talking is a bit too fast.
The truth is what ever form reality takes doesn't change our position or perspective within it. Accept the things you cannot know, or the weight of uncertainty will crush you from within.
We're told that as AI learns, it will evolve and improve itself at an exponential rate. If that is true, the main thing holding it back is the materials to create new technology, i.e metals, plastics etc etc, which have to be mined, refined and worked, to create machines. Wouldn't it be much more efficient if AI could recreate itself using proteins, amino acids, and a string of code, to direct self building, self replicating "machines". What I'm saying is, are we biological machines? Could DNA and biology itself, be the idea of an "artificial" intelligence, as it looked for news ways to improve on itself? We create machines inspired by biology, but is biology the concept of a "machine"? Then, to take it one step further, did a higher AI actually even build the biological machines, or is this reality all just one of many test simulations/scenarios that a higher AI is running through, in its processor, as it figures out which would be the most efficient and effective way to proceed?
Truth is Relative
Yaay more Ian! Good obit too.
Porno
Don't wake it then.
Wokism is literally Jew Hatred and Antisemitism like never since the nazis .
Actually..woke... comes from critical theory... from the Frankfurt school.. A Bolshevik Jew think tank.
How did the arab world got away with supporting (still) nazism and pan-arabist nationalism, ethnically cleansing 1.5 million Jews and being extremely antisemitic (IDC they are semitic might as well call it jew hatred), and get all of this sympathy from woke liberals
At least they agree there is Jew hatred
If you keep getting kicked out of every party, it might be your fault
@@theredgoblin562What?
Jewish genocide of Palestinians, also a semitic people, makes it increasingly difficult not to be anti-Zionist. Stop your godless immoral genocide and maybe you won't be encouraging people worldwide to hate you.
The real genocide happened in the arab world where all arab countries ethnically cleansed 1.5 million jewish people of the land.
@@DasParanoi8Projekt When?
Forcing the innocent to pay nonvictims for something that happened to neither of them is not reparations. Government is a manufactured tool. Holding those presently in government responsible for the actions of those in government in the past is like holding the present owner of a used car responsible for the traffic violations of a previous owner.
Ok let’s exclude slavery. How about Jim Crow? -Exclusion from the Homestead Act - Exclusion from the GI Bill - Destruction of black cities- Tulsa, Rosewood, Elaine, Oscarville - Terrorism- KKK, Lynching, unaliving blk leaders, blowing up churches - Highway Commission Act/ Eminent Domain - Reaganomics and Iran Contra/ Dumping drugs in the community Mass Incarceration - Denial of FHA loans I have about seven more things I could list here. It’s not just about slavery. You people need to learn your history and address your deep-seated hatred for the black race. We have found the the money and moral compass to pay other groups reparations, some of whom were not even discriminated against on American soil. Was it fair that black folks taxes went to paying those people? You all are hypocrites. I wish you would just tell the truth and say you don’t want to pay it because you just despise us, vs acting like our claims are invalid or unfair.
This is what genius is. 😃
The notion of 'surplus value' clearly isn't true.
I'm in awe of your video editing skills. ��
Where does qualia fit into this ?
I'm so glad I discovered this.
The dude in the beginning sounds like brainy smurf
Yep..the simulation is real
Those calling for reparations betray their own failures. The successful do not call for reparations; their success is the best revenge. USA: former colony of England; USA: successful country not asking for reparations. Australia: former colony of England; Australia: successful country not asking for reparations. Taiwan: former colony of Japan; Taiwan: successful country not asking for reparations. South Korea: former colony of Japan; South Korea: successful country not asking for reparations. North Korea: former colony of Japan; North Korea: failed nation, should it ask for reparations? Israel did not beg for reparations. The winners of WW2 (the Allied forces and the USSR) demanded Germany to make reparations to the victims of the Holocaust, not to Israel proper (Israel came to be in 1948). Besides, modern Israel was never a colony. But, but, but ancient Israel was a colony of Ancient Roman Empire!!! Israel, sue for reparations from Italy!!! It is pitiful to see failed countries pleading for "reparations" from former colonizers. They fought, figuratively and literally, for their Independence which was granted or won. However, said failed nations did not know what to do with their Independence. Independence to an unprepared nation is akin to giving a loaded gun to a monkey. Failures have a proven record of failing time and time again and show no exercise of self-repair. Monetary "reparations" will repair nothing. Monetary "reparations" is akin to giving more heroin to the heroin addict: short term pleasure followed with long term pain. Actual healing is done from within, not from without. Paradox of getting a bank loan: those in the least need of loans are most likely to get loans. If you have outstanding debt, no job, criminal record, living on the streets, you definitely NEED a loan (MONEY!!! I NEED MONEY!!!) but you are unlikely to get a loan. Of course you have a long list of reasons for your pitiful situation ("The Police planted the drugs on me!", "My great-great-great-grand parents were SLAVES!!!", "Wypiple stole my wealth!!", etc.). But no matter: No. Money. For. You. Those most likely to get reparations are those who are demanding it from strength; but then, given your strength, you are unlikely to ask for reparations: Success is the best Revenge. But, but, but some Native American Tribes are getting REPARATIONS!!! Yep. Despite "reparations", said tribes are still stuck in Poverty and Misery. One bad policy ("reparations" to american tribes) should not be followed by another bad one ("reparations" to ADOS/FBA). In fact, all bad policies should be eliminated. But, but, but some Japanese got REPARATIONS!!! Yes. The paradox of getting a bank loan in play. The Japanese community has done much better than average in the USA and reparations were neither needed nor desired. Reparations were given to the Japanese actually interned ($20K per individual), not to the progeny of said Japanese. Those in the Black Community pushing for reparations show all the characteristics of a failing community. Many past programs focused on the Black Community (LBJ's Grand Society Programs, the HBCU's, Affirmative Action Programs, busing Blacks to White schools, establishment of Liberia, extended Welfare State, etc..) are reparations. In 1911, Booker T Washington warned us of the grifters, the poverty pimps: "There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs-partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs." Frederick Douglass was against reparations. Quotation from "WHAT SHALL BE DONE WITH THE SLAVES IF EMANCIPATED?" (Douglass' Monthly, January, 1862): "Our answer is, do nothing with them; mind your business, and let them mind theirs. Your doing with them is their greatest misfortune. They have been undone by your doings, and all they now ask, and really have need of at your hands, is just to let them alone. They suffer by every interference, and succeed best by being let alone." The current supplicants for reparations are dishonoring, disgracing the legacies of Booker T Washington and Frederick Douglass; they were actually slaves, not you. But, but, but JIM CROW LAWS!!! Yep. A racist system set up by the Democrat Party (the Republican Party freed the slaves). Get reparations from the Democrat Party. And yet... African-Americans vote Democrat 85% of the time as of 2024 AD. Go figure. African-Americans suffering from Stockholm syndrome. The Blacks need mental help, not reparations. But, but, but SLAVES built the USA!!! Nope. HELPED build the USA, Yes. BUILT the USA, No. Slavery is low-tech. The USA of Automobiles, Gene Therapy, Space Travel, Computers, Internet is high-tech. High-Tech is impossible via Slavery. If Slavery were around today, the USA would be deep in Misery and Poverty, with Donkey and Horse as main Transportation. Slaves were used because one cannot train Donkey and Horse to pick cotton; with the mechanical cotton harvester, slavery became useless and uneconomical. Slaves did not invent the mechanical cotton harvester. The FBA (Foundational Black American), the ADOS (American Descendent of Slavery) should pay extra taxes to the Government to express gratitude for having their ancestors sent to the blessed land of America on a slave ship. Muhammed Ali, after the fight with George Foreman, said "I am glad my grand pappy came to America on a slave ship". The FBA, the ADOS could be stuck in Africa today (the horror!!!) if not for the slave trade. The FBA and ADOS need to kiss the White Man's gluteus maximus.
Demanding reparations for long past damages to ancestors (slavery) is stupid and unwise. The statute of limitations has been long expired; slaves and slave owners are long, long dead. There was a limited time after the Civil War to demand legitimately for reparations for freed slaves from slave owners. OK, expropriate the wealth of the former slave owners and transfer said wealth to the freed slaves. History is tragic. The Civil War wiped out utterly the wealth of 99% of the former slave owners and many former slave owners were not land owners. Post-Civil War there was little to distribute to former slaves because nearly all southerners (Black, White) became destitute from the war. Who benefitted (financially, property-wise, wealth-wise) from the Civil War? Answer: the Northerners and they were not slave owners. But, but, but the evil Southern slave owners traded with the Northerners!!! The Northerners need to pay reparations!!! Nope. Said evil Southern slave owners traded also with people of Europe, Asia, South and Central America, even Africa. Should one demand reparations from Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Africa, Australia? The source of slaves in the Americas was the African Continent. Africans selling off their ethnic siblings to slavery to the Western market (the Americas) and Eastern market (Muslim world) benefitted monetarily from the trade. Go demand reparations from the various African Nations. All African Nations will laugh at such demands for reparations. Go demand reparations from the various Muslim Nations. All Muslim Nations will laugh at such demands for reparations. Booker T. Washington (former slave) wrote about former slaves helping out their former owners who fell on hard times. Should said former slaves DEMAND reparations instead of helping the former owners? The slave revenge movies are popular today (2024 AD). A village has been totally destroyed by a tornado. God is guilty of this EVIL!!! Demand reparations from God!!! Such thoughts are idiotic. Someone damaged either your person or your property. You have full rights to demand reparations from the guilty. However, tragically, the guilty is often destitute so what reparations can you get? Are you going to mourn your loss forever and never do anything? A village has been totally destroyed by a tornado. What to do? Wait until God provides reparations? Or would you get up and rebuild the village? A drug-addicted, homeless, penniless, deranged arsonist burned down your house. What to do? Do nothing, do not rebuild the house until the arsonist made FULL Reparations? Question: Should you suffer for the sins of your dead parents? Should you pay off the debts of your dead parents? Generational servitude is sustained by having children obligated for the debts of their parents: this is the history of poverty in 3rd world countries, aka s**th**e countries. There is an asymmetry. I am sure you are very eager to collect what is owed to your dead parents. Even if the debt is owed only to your dead great-great-great-grand parents. Underlying this eagerness is greed. This asymmetry makes one blind to the other party. You are not the sole party in society. Others (the other party) are also part of society. Question rephrased: Should the other party suffer for the sins of their dead parents? Should the other party pay off the debts of their dead parents? Some reparations seekers may quote the Bible. Proverbs 3:27 = Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your power to act. The problem is that nothing is owed to the reparation seekers who are just grifters looking for something for nothing. If someone was owed, it is the long-dead great-great-great-grand parents, NOT you. Justice. The issue of reparation is often linked to that of justice. When you go to court, you do not determine what Justice is. The Judge, the Court, the Jury decide what is Justice for you. You may not be satisfied with the Justice but if you want to stay a citizen in good standing with society, you have to ACCEPT the Judgement. What you are seeking is not so much Justice but Satisfaction. Satisfaction has more in common with Retribution than with Justice. Yes, you can appeal again and again and again and again. You just become a vexatious litigant and your standing in society diminishes. You become a liability, not an asset to society. Think of the Bible as a collection of writings by the Ancients Sages, not so much the Word of God. Deuteronomy 15 : 1 = At the end of every seven years you must cancel debts. Comment: The above verse refers to you who want reparations. If reparations is debt, cancel the debt. What is your valuation of the concept of "statute of limitations"? Deuteronomy 15 : 3 = You may require payment from a foreigner, but you must cancel any debt your brother owes you. Comment: Who is supposed to pay this "reparation"? Which entity is supposed to pay this "reparation"? Do you consider this entity to be a foreigner or a sibling? Deuteronomy 15 :11 = There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be openhanded toward your brothers and toward the poor and needy in your land. Comment: The above verse refers to you who want reparations. Instead of demanding "reparations", try to become an asset, not a liability, to your society. The mob's motto: No Justice, no Peace! Much of the violence, turmoil, dystopia in this World is caused by people pursuing JUSTICE!!!, pursuing COSMIC JUSTICE!!! Question: what do you value more: Justice? Peace?
Claiming victimhood for what happened to other people is disgraceful. Ascribing guilt to people who had nothing to do with the offense is atrocious.
yeah atheism is pretty much dead but also not needed, since Atheists and Christians we're at each others through, ah yes, the good day when Christianity was strong... so since the world is pretty much godless, not me I am still Christian (yeah I get it I have a degree in Philosophy also) but for the most part Atheists are not needed, I mean most 'christians' will agree with them anyway so yeah you not gonna get much comments and if so yt will like block 'em but regarding the philosophical narrative, makes sense, so in that regard I wish this got more views
I like this episode and your voices sound so amazing ❤ so happy I discovered yall
maybe there's something the matter with common sense. Philosophers of yore would have no problem saying that.
Machiasmelly
2pac doesn’t say anything in “Blasphemy” about it “being better to be hated than feared” but other than that not a bad video
Brownie Recipe: INGREDIENTS 1/2 cup unsalted butter, melted and HOT 1 tablespoon cooking oil, (olive oil or coconut oil are fine) 1 1/8 cup superfine sugar, (caster sugar or white granulated sugar)* 2 large eggs 2 teaspoons pure vanilla extract 1/2 cup all purpose (or plain) flour 1/2 cup unsweetened cocoa powder 1/4 teaspoon salt INSTRUCTIONS Preheat oven to 350°F (175°C). Lightly grease an 8-inch square baking pan with cooking oil spray. Line with parchment paper (or baking paper); set aside. Combine hot melted butter, oil and sugar together in a medium-sized bowl. Whisk well for about a minute. Add the eggs and vanilla; beat until lighter in colour (another minute). Sift in flour, cocoa powder and salt. Gently fold the dry ingredients into the wet ingredients until JUST combined (do NOT over beat as doing so well affect the texture of your brownies). Pour batter into prepared pan, smoothing the top out evenly. (OPTIONAL: Top with chocolate chunks or chocolate chips.) Bake for 20-25 minutes, or until the centre of the brownies in the pan no longer jiggles and is just set to the touch (the brownies will keep baking in the hot pan out of the oven). If testing with a toothpick, the toothpick should come out dirty for fudge-textured brownies. Remove and allow to cool to room temperature before slicing into 16 brownies. OPTIONAL ADD INS: Crushed walnuts, peanuts, almonds, pecans, chocolate chips, peanut butter chips, chocolate chunks, dried fruit (cranberries, raisins, etc)
Hey, thank you for uploading this kind of knowledgeable video.
That’s my sister right there!
The spirit of Aristotelian inquiry is really what gives the West the advantage on average from the perspective of acquiring scientific knowledge. We for instance ate a crop that was 1/4 the caloric content as rice, which is present in South Asia and Eastern China, which is why their populations were at a minimum twice as large as ours, and therefore had half the scientists, yet we were almost equal in terms of scientific advancement. It will be very interesting to see what hybrid cultures like Japan see happen in the far future, and certainly since the masse conquest of almost the entire world by the West has spread that spirit to every corner of the world, as such one can only imagine what the Chinese and South Asians will do with it given their calorie advantage.
Him saying Nitch makes it even better😭.
🧑🚒
Hume was a Scottish philosopher, not an English one!
Excellent insights we need for these times!
It’s rare when an individual’s accent makes me irrationally angry but the combination of Josh’s accent, his tone, and cadence, all have the same effect on me of the Rage Virus from 28 days later. It just makes me want to find everybody on earth who shares that particular way of speaking and commit several violations of the Geneva convention in order to assure that it never passes on to another person. It’s like if a valley girl made a baby with a scraping chalkboard and it grew up in a lab of coked up scientists working on a project titled “Make M.K-ULTRA worse” led by the same people who did the Abu Ghraib atrocities who are all off their antidepressants and just quit smoking
Around the world in 80 seconds, 2023 Edition. Welcome back.
The beatniks and the hippies are still here and we are, indeed, GONE. One ought not assume an argument is sound merely because it is made by an expert from Dartmouth, any more than one should assume a proposition to be true merely because it was asserted by Bertrand Russell. (If forced to choose between the opinions of the two for practical purposes, my bet would be on Russell. But whether this bet would be arrived at by strictly rational means is another question.)
Why hasnt this video gained likes? Or veiws? Or even comments? Let me fix that
Can science be a religion? From the blind faith I see some people put in science I believe it is.
😞 P r o m o S M
Baby don't hurt me, Baby don't hurt me no more
Reparations is bullshit and will not pay for it!! I don’t have to!!
When you account 4 all the theft,they should owe the government and not the other way.😊